God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason is a book by the Dutch philosopher Herman Philipse, written in English and published in the. Given, however, that we are living in the age of science, Philipse argues that the natural theologian is faced with a dilemma he calls “The. God in the Age of Science?: A Critique Of Religious Reason. by. Herman Philipse . Philipse tackles religion from an epistemilogical point of view whereas most.
Abraham – – In William J. Reconstructing Reality Margaret Morrison. It’s unfortunate because the critiques of belief itself are ignored as some outcome of one’s impression on the utility of religion, they remain largely unaddressed.
Bernard Neary rated it really liked it Feb 21, But the real concern is the answer to the third dilemma, with Richard Swinburne’s cumulative inductive case for the existence of God taken as the paradigmatic example of how one ought to approach God in the age of science.
The Book of Job raises the same issue and with great subtlety. Philipse explores the four options a This is absolutely the best book on this subject. Classical, Early, and Medieval Poetry and Poets: In response, I would say that laws of nature presumably shape our predictions of phenomena, so at least one kind of phenomena, scientific predictions, are indubitably caused at least in part by the laws of nature.
CS1 Dutch-language sources nl Articles needing additional references from July All articles needing additional references. First, a serious examination of natural theology usually presupposes, or takes a view or presents some case for a particular understanding of causation, which alone gives us access to knowledge of remote forces and agents of any kind.
With regard to the domain of science, Philipse places great value on the power of scientific methods to make predictions. If areligious belief c needs to be backed up by reasons evidence, or d it does not. Belief in God and the Existence of God. Indeed, Philipse is at his best, I think, when he challenges claims belonging to revealed theology that have been appropriated and presented as natural theology.
Paul seems to deny that Jesus was resurrected with his earthly or physical body, arguing that he was raised with a new, spiritual and heavenly body sooma pneumatikonsince ‘flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God’ 5; cf. Using a “strategy of subsidiary arguments,” Philipse concludes 1 that theism cannot be stated meaningfully; 2 that if theism were meaningful, it would have no predictive power concerning existing evidence, so that Bayesian arguments cannot get started; and 3 that if the Bayesian cumulative case strategy did work, one should conclude that atheism is more probable than theism.
Authors Affiliations are at time of print publication. He rejects the view that laws of nature are causes:. The question the book explores is what to make of a concept like God in light of modern science, and is largely an exploration of the case made by the philosopher Richard Swinburne.
God in the Age of Science? – Wikipedia
Philipse deals with this argument early, but as a justification this keeps coming up in Swinburne’s inductive argument. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Geoffrey Cumberlege, Oxford University Press, In his philosophical work, Philipse defends a non-reductionist naturalism, akin to that of Gilbert Ryle, Peter Strawson, and P.
Civil War American History: Explain the “reasons” for atheism and explain away the need to address atheism. This article needs additional citations for verification. It’s not that God is a nonsense notion, it’s that atheists have some psychological hatred of theism as it is practised that pphilipse to the denial of God altogether.
Search my Subject Specializations: While these two categories have some overlap, it’s worth remembering that truth and utility aren’t the same ogd.
This book might have been successful as a focused critique of excessive and poorly justified claims that are sometimes made in the name of natural theology. He has written numerous articles on modern philosophy and epistemology, and his most recent books are Atheistisch manifest Prometheus,; new edition Bert Bakker,Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: To ask other readers questions about God in the Age of Science?
Classical, Early, and Medieval World History: Jon Myerov rated it really liked it Nov 24, Reginald Le rated it it was amazing Dec 20, Given, however, that we are living in the age of science, Philipse argues that the tbe theologian is faced with a dilemma he calls ” The Tension ” Nick marked it as to-read Oct 19,